Bitcoin’s Climate Impact Is Global. The Cures Are Local.

The operators of the only bitcoin mine in Missoula County, Montana, thought they were doing everything right. They set up shop in an abandoned mill on the edge of town, made a plan to recycle the computers when they conked out, and contracted with a nearby dam for cheap renewable power. Sure, it might be a warehouse full of energy-intensive computers and cooling systems, designed to churn out digital money day and night. But it would be a low-carbon, low-impact operation all the same.

Not so fast, said county officials. They pointed to a different culprit: a giant coal plant halfway across the state. If energy from the dam went to bitcoin mining, they said, the county as a whole would wind up using more coal. In April, officials required all future mines to build their own renewable power.

Missoula County was on the right track, says Christian Stoll, an energy researcher at the Technical University of Munich. In a paper published Wednesday in the journal Joule, his team takes a closer look at the energy consumption of bitcoin mining, based on where miners are located and the types of machines they are using. “Coal is fueling Bitcoin,” he says. “The question is how to prevent it, and that’s up to local regulators.”

Bitcoin mining, a process called “proof-of-work,” involves a global network of machines racing to solve complex math. In return for helping to keep the network secure, the solver receives bitcoin. When it comes to measuring energy use, the global nature of that activity makes it difficult to study; it’s hard to know what kinds of machines are running, where they’re located, and the fuel used to supply the electricity.

Those unknowns have led to wildly varying estimates. One study said that growth in bitcoin mining alone could result in a 2 degree Celsius increase in global temperatures. But others say such estimates are inflated as miners increasingly flock to sources of cheap renewable energy, like hydropower.

Stoll’s team was able to take a more granular look thanks to a stroke of good timing. Last year, three Chinese makers of mining hardware, responsible for producing nearly all of the world’s machines, filed for initial public offerings. In the process, they disclosed a trove of technical details and data about market share that’s usually kept under wraps. Poring through those documents, the researchers could assemble a look at what kind of equipment is being used and where.

Another advantage: Bitcoin isn’t as decentralized as it looks. Gone are the days of anonymously mining bitcoin on your home computer. Today, the network is dominated by a handful of “pools,” which coordinate their efforts. By locating the IP addresses of the pools’ servers and devices, the team found it could develop a rough geographical footprint of bitcoin mining.

full article
full report
funny postget more
get more info
get more information
get redirected here
get the facts
go here
go now
go right here
go to the website
go to these guys
go to this site
go to this web-site
go to this website
go to website
going here
great post to read
great site
had me going
have a peek at these guys
have a peek at this site
have a peek at this web-site
have a peek at this website
have a peek here
he has a good point
he said
helpful hints
helpful resources
helpful site
her comment is here
her explanation
her latest blog
her response
here are the findings
his comment is here
his explanation
his response
home page
hop over to here
hop over to these guys
hop over to this site
hop over to this web-site
hop over to this website
how much is yours worth?
how you can help
i loved this
i thought about this
i was reading this
image source
in the know
informative post

Adjusting for factors like the size of the mining facilities (bigger ones can be cooled more efficiently) and the average emissions in popular regions for mining, Stoll’s team estimated Bitcoin’s CO2 emissions at about 22 megatons per year. That puts it somewhere between the annual emissions of Jordan and Sri Lanka. Or, to put it another way, it’s roughly the carbon footprint of the Kansas City metro area. (Yes, that should tell you we use a helluva lot of energy in this country.) That’s actually on the conservative end of other, more alarming estimates. Factoring in other crypto coins that use similar proof-of-work algorithms—Ethereum, Monero, zCash, and others—the emissions figure could roughly double, Stoll says.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.